Article Text

Download PDFPDF

149 Clinical outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
Free
  1. Raheel Ahmed1,
  2. Mushood Ahmed1,
  3. Areeba Ahsan2,
  4. Karthikeyan Sivasankaran3,
  5. Mansimran Singh Dulay4,
  6. Kamleshun Ramphul5,
  7. Alexander Liu5,
  8. Rui Shi5,
  9. Alessia Azzu5,
  10. Joseph Okafor5,
  11. Kshama Wechalekar5,
  12. Jonh Baksi5,
  13. Rajdeep Khattar5,
  14. Peter Collins5,
  15. Athol Wells5,
  16. Vasileios Kouranos5,
  17. Rakesh Sharma5
  1. 1Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, Rawalpindi, LND SW3 6NP, UK
  2. 2Rawalpindi Medical University
  3. 3Foundation University School of health sciences, Islamabad
  4. 4Northumbria Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  5. 5Royal Brompton Hospital
  6. 6Independent Researcher, Mauritius

Abstract

Background Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) can present with atrioventricular conduction defects and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may improve ejection fraction, reduce mortality and HF-related hospitalization in CS patients, however the clinical evidence supporting its efficacy is very limited.

Purpose The aim of this study is to systematically synthesize the available data and provide the most comprehensive evidence regarding the effectiveness of CRT in patients with CS. This is the first proportional meta-analysis to assess the usefulness of CRT in CS and address the existing literature gap.

Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library from inception to February 2024. The aim of this search was to identify studies that reported clinical outcomes following the use of CRT in CS patients. Data for outcomes was extracted, pooled, and analyzed. We used OpenMetaAnalyst for pooling untransformed proportions using DerSimonian Laird random effects model.

Results Five studies with a total of 176 CS patients who received CRT were included. The pooled incidence for all-cause mortality was 7.6% (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.18), for HF-related hospitalizations 23.2% (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.43), and for major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events 27% (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.45) on a mean follow-up of 21.6 months in patients who received CRT. The pooled left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 34.28% (95% CI: 29.88 to 38.68) showing an improvement of 3.75% in LVEF from baseline. The average New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was 2.16 (95% CI: 1.47 to 2.84) after CRT as compared to baseline average NYHA of 2.58.

Conclusion CRT leads to variable response in patients with CS. Although improvements were observed in LVEF and average NYHA, further evidence is required to establish the effectiveness of CRT.

Abstract 149 Figure 1

A: Forest Plot of all-cause mortality in studies containing cardiac sarcoidosis patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. B: Forest Plot of heart failure related hospitalizations in studies containing cardiac sarcoidosis patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. C: Forest Plot for major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events in studies containing cardiac sarcoidosis patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. D: Forest Plot for left ventricular ejection fractions in studies containing cardiac sarcoidosis patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. E: Forest Plot for NYHA class in studies containing cardiac sarcoidosis patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Conflict of Interest none

  • Cardiac sarcoidosis
  • cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • meta-analysis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.